Commentary for Bava Kamma 67:2
לא לעולם אימא לך מה שגבה גבה ושאני התם דא"ל אילו גבך הוה לא מינך הוה גבי ליה דהאי תורא דאזקן מיניה משתלמנא:
Can it be concluded from this that where a creditor of a subsequent date has preceded a creditor of an earlier date in distraining on [the property of the debtor], the distraint is of no legal avail?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Whereas this is a point on which opinions differ; cf. Keth. 94a. ');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 67:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.